A well written agreement is integral to a successful partnership. When an agreement lacks clarity or provides an unrealistic division of roles and responsibilities, issues may arise in all aspects of managing and operating the site.
Agreements are often created without appropriate expertise or detailed understanding of operations. In some cases, agreements do not exist at all between owners and operators or third parties, leaving everyone involved vulnerable to liability and instability. There are also instances where an agreement exists, but partners do not understand or respect it. It is crucial to establish mutual understanding from the start and build in mechanisms for review and adjustment over time.
Agreements need to be revisited because partnerships inevitably change over time. Perhaps the initial roles envisioned for the partnership are no longer practical for the site, or the status of the property changes, as in the case of a community group taking on operations to save a building from demolition. Having a formal conversation about the relationship agreement provides a context to explore and accommodate changing needs.
Partnerships are highly unique, shaped by the specific conditions of each site and characteristics of each partner involved. For this reason, it is not possible to provide a standard template for partnership agreements at historic sites. Agreements must be tailored to these unique circumstances every time a new partnership is formed.
The following general best practices can be applied by all parties involved. Agreement writing should consider the principles and recommendations contained elsewhere in the Toolkit, as well.
Agreement periods longer than one year offer greater security in strategic and financial planning, while agreement periods that are too long between renewals can limit evolution and impose outdated mechanisms. Determine a renewal schedule that best suits each party’s needs and build that into the agreement.
Write the agreement collaboratively with appropriate expertise and representation at the table. Developing the agreement may be a lengthy process and should not be rushed. Consider the timelines of the partners with whom you are working and their decision-making process when establishing a negotiation schedule. A partner with a consensus-based process may take longer than a hierarchical structure will.
Include a statement that reflects the partners’ shared vision for the site, which will help establish a direction for long term planning. Sections of the agreement may require different levels of specificity. For example, terms around finances and maintenance should be highly specific while site use and programming can be laid out more broadly, offering freedom for development.
Divide roles and responsibilities according to the expertise, skills, and resources of each partner. Doing so will set up a balanced structure with which to move forward. Ensure the agreement reflects an understanding of roles.
Build in success indicators to avoid complacency in the implementation of the agreement. It is also crucial to integrate limitations (funding, staff time, etc.) based on realistic expectations of what each partner can offer.
Integrate measures that ensure owner oversight and accountability on the part of operator or third party, while leaving room for flexibility so that these parties can evolve in their roles.